As reported yesterday, Mueller Water Products (MWA/NYSE) was purchased at $15.88 per share. Mueller is the largest supplier of water and natural gas flow-control products used by municipalities.
Mueller was bought by Walter Industries in October 2005 and partially spun off in May 2006 at $16 per share. There are more than 131 million shares outstanding and the market capitalization is approximately $2 billion. The stock currently trades at about one times sales. There is no dividend.
This is a de-leveraging play. Mueller has more than $1 billion in debt -- its tangible book value is a negative $5.60 per share. Yet the company generates lots of cash to pay it down and should continue generating cash for years to come.
Why? Because a lot of new infrastructure and repair projects are on the horizon as US municipalities and water utilities enter a major spending cycle to replace pipes and valves for the first time in as many as 50 years.
Eagle Capital Partners’ Meryl Witmer noted in Barron’s midyear Roundtable that the American Society of Civil Engineers gave the nation’s aging water infrastructure a grade of D minus in 2005. So Mueller should get a good-sized chunk of the new business in the future due to its excellent distribution network and the fact that it is a low-cost producer.
Top executives and directors of Mueller have been aggressively buying the stock. Among them is Chief Operating Officer Dale Smith, with the company through a series of transitions over two decades, who purchased $1.5 million worth of stock in June.
Risks with this pick include:
- New construction and repair projects could always be fewer than anticipated; foreign competition could erode pricing; and/or materials costs could rise faster than expected. These would hurt the company’s efforts to pay down debt.
- Walter Industries intends to distribute its remaining shares of Mueller in the coming months. This overhang will probably limit share price appreciation in the near term.
- Mueller is still in the process of integrating operations that were combined to form the company last year. The company’s operating and earnings potential is likely to be masked by one-time factors and expenses over the coming quarters.
I view the negatives as being concentrated in the short term. With Mueller’s stock being bought below the IPO price, I like this pick as a long term holding.
But please, do your own due diligence before buying.
UPDATE 10/04/06: I bought more Mueller Water Products today at $14.12 per share. The stock ended the day at $14.39. For the purposes of this blog, the average cost is $15.64.
The better play here is Walter
Industries WLT.
WLT Market Cap is 2.5B of which
1.4B is MWP which means the rest of the company is only be valued
at 1.1B.
This 1.1B includes coal and home building. The coal business is expected to do 350M of EBITDA.
This equates to a 4 multiple for the coal business plus you get home building for free.
Posted by: Sider | July 20, 2006 at 08:17 PM
Sider,
Your comment is compelling. I've been thinking about buying both MWA and WLT.
I do like MWA as a pure play on water infrastructure, though.
Thanks for reading.
Posted by: John | July 20, 2006 at 09:55 PM
MWA has the best products in waterworks industry. Also US PIPE sells a lot of pipe outside the US.
Posted by: Glenno | January 08, 2007 at 07:39 PM
Hi John,
I spent some time this weekend doing a write-up on MWA and I thought I'd post the link here so you could take a look.
http://www.stokblogs.com/user/103/blog
Posted by: biscosc | February 26, 2007 at 02:54 PM
Hi John - I hold MWA and like yourself have a higher cost basis. Have you considered adding any shares at this level? The analysts are pretty down - sighting primarily the lack of new housing. Yesterday's 10K wasn't particularly inspiring either but I tend to hold stocks for quite a while if I see potential...any thoughts? Really enjoy your site - keep up the good work. Peter
Posted by: Peter | November 29, 2007 at 12:25 PM
Peter: I'm pretty disheartened about MWA in that it has become a play on residential housing, when I thought it was an infrastructure play. If that's true, selling would be a case of selling at a bottom.
I noticed earlier this year that Meryl Witmer's firm exited the stock (and it was at higher prices). Perhaps I should have as well.
Right now, I'm holding and not adding. If that changes, you'll read it on the blog. And if you chose to add, check out MWAB, which has been selling at a discount to the A shares.
Thanks for your comments and I'll try to make the blog worthy of your continued readership.
Posted by: John | November 29, 2007 at 11:41 PM