Stephen Vines writes in The Spectator about the enduring trends of stock markets:
American experts have dominated the sub-genre of identifying panic cycles, notably the market historian Charles Kindleberger and the economist Hyman Minsky. Based on their work, it is possible to identify the stages of the cycle — but not, to pre-empt the obvious question, to know exactly when it will end.
You can read the 12 steps by reading the linked article. Of course, the question most want to know is are we near or at a bottom? Vines ends with this:
The time to return to the market is generally marked by an end to extreme volatility; sure, the best bargains will have gone by then but so will the false dawns that lure in the witless, convinced that sharp price rises mean they need to rush back in the market. Investors with a really long-term perspective will simply wait until compelling valuations emerge on shares they think are trading at bargain basement levels, even if the basement keeps getting lower. That, basically, is the Warren Buffett view of share-buying. But interestingly, these days he’s less attracted by playing the stock market than by direct investment in undervalued companies.
vines' book 'market panic' is well worth a read in this environment.
Posted by: eddie bravo | November 20, 2008 at 08:40 PM
eb: Thanks for the mention of the book and the title -- I wasn't aware he'd written it.
Posted by: John | November 20, 2008 at 08:51 PM